A 4 year old Phoenix boy drowned in a pool today. His Dad had worked overnight and was taking a nap…is Joe a jerk for believing the Dad is at fault here?
The speed cameras around AZ are always pitched to you with the claim they make your drive safter…is that claim true?
And why do women carry so much in their purses?
You’re a jerk. You have NO IDEA exactly what the hell happened with these kids. You have NO IDEA what was going on with the father. The father is a HARD WORKING father. The kids, yes, they will be kids, kids do stupid stuff but you know what? They did provide a protection for these kids against the pool! So think about that!! And stop being so insensitive by saying YOU’RE the kid. You are really friggin retarded by saying that.
Is there honestly anyone out there (including the dad) who is denying the dad is at fault??? Is the dad going to try and defend himself or his horrible horrible mistake? It was a mistake, of course, but it cost his son his life. I can’t imagine a parent in this situation doing anything but accepting full responsibility, beating themself up and never forgiving themself. There is no excuse. A precious life is gone forever because daddy took a nap.
Joe Crummey, you say you read that article about the cameras “with a close eye”! Send me that article and Id be happy to tell you if what you’re saying is true. Nice job at not telling anyone where this article is so no one can read it but only post a picture of the camera up! Nice Job!
Hey Jacob…take a chill pill…here’s the article if you’d like to read it…
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/04/08/20090408highway-fatals0408.html
Thank you for the Article! I wasnt saying you’re wrong! I was only stating you left out the source.
“That trend is expected to continue, partly because a wider use of speed cameras on Arizona highways and freeways will help push the rate lower, state Department of Public Safety officials said”
From what I heard, you think that the state is trying to fully take credit for its statement, from what you say, 100% contributed to speed light cameras!
If you take a loook at the word “PARTLY”, it is simply stating it is not stating that it is the only contribution!
Also from what it looks like, it is only focused on saying by placing these cameras, the ROAD FATALITIES have been lower! It does not look like, at any stance, it is trying to say that they are taking credit for all sorts of fatalities throughout the state such as murder, manslaughter, suicide, etc….
“DUI laws are only one factor that can shape a state’s fatality record”
Also, another thing about the drowning Joe! My fiance was in a drowning accident when she was 2 years old and when the news reached her father about this, he had a stroke and passed away. So you tell me if you still want to be insensitive about this matter Joe!
The only reason for traffic light cameras is for income. Govt. entities that claim otherwise are liars! Truth is that accident rates go higher at camera lights but income for area that camera is in goes WAY up. Cities who install cameras do not care about safety - just income. Just another tax to impose on drivers! Jim