Top

David Duke: No difference between any candidates

February 27, 2008

Remember David Duke? The former Ku Klux Klan member was also elected as a state Representative from Louisiana and almost elected Governor there. Yes, he has back in the news thanks to the folks at the New Republic. He calls himself a white nationalist. We call him a racist.
The New Republic quotes him as saying,

I “don’t see much difference in Barack Obama than Hillary Clinton–or, for that matter, John McCain.”

Duke adds this later in the piece:

“I don’t think Obama will be any more negative for the United States than Hillary or John McCain, In fact, we probably have less preference for a European like a John McCain or a Hillary who has betrayed our interests, our heritage, our rights.”

So honestly, who really cares what David Duke’s political analysis is? The man in completely irrelevant, but this is how much coverage this election is getting. McCain might not be the best candidate in the world for conservatives, but he is a far cry from both Clinton and Obama.

Comments

2 Responses to “David Duke: No difference between any candidates”

  1. Texas Al on February 28th, 2008 10:21 am

    David Duke, the SS groupie is irrelevant. In the end, no matter who is nominated the voters will be given the usual choice of Tweetie Bird and Goofy. It is safe to say that if Obama is the Democratic Party candidate, he will lose in McGovernite style - maybe with luck, 100 electoral college votes.

    Now, a real intelligent fight with clear cut defined stands and issue would have been John Edwards v. Mitt Romney. Ah, but the media did a hatchet job on both because they don’t want the voters to have an intelligent choice.

  2. John L on February 28th, 2008 10:28 am

    Wow. This guy has crawled out of his hole yet again.

Got something to say?





Bottom